Jordan vs Slovenia: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen

Jordan
4,516 t
in 2023
Slovenia
3,705 t
in 2023
Jordan rank
130th
Slovenia rank
133rd

Leaching — Cropland nitrogen over time

  • Jordan
  • Slovenia
02.0k4.0k6.0k196119922023

How they compare

Jordan currently reports 4,516 t against 3,705 t in Slovenia, a difference of 811 t.

That makes Jordan's figure about 1.2 times Slovenia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Slovenia ahead.

Jordan ranks 130th and Slovenia ranks 133rd of 201 countries.

Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jordan Slovenia Difference Ahead
1990s 1,401 t 5,340 t 3,938 t Slovenia
2000s 1,444 t 4,511 t 3,068 t Slovenia
2010s 2,658 t 4,030 t 1,371 t Slovenia
2020s 3,404 t 3,968 t 564.22 t Slovenia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen, Jordan or Slovenia?
Jordan, at 4,516 t against 3,705 t in Slovenia as of 2023.
What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen between Jordan and Slovenia?
811 t, with Jordan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Slovenia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Jordan and Slovenia rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen?
Jordan ranks 130th and Slovenia ranks 133rd of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).