Kenya vs Sudan (former): Leaching — Cropland nitrogen
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Kenya
- Sudan (former)
How they compare
Sudan (former) currently reports 33,266 t against 31,228 t in Kenya, a difference of 2,038 t.
That makes Sudan (former)'s figure about 1.1 times Kenya's.
Across all 51 years both countries report, Sudan (former) has been ahead every year.
Kenya ranks 59th and Sudan (former) ranks 58th of 201 countries.
Sudan (former) has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kenya | Sudan (former) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4,288 t | 6,887 t | 2,598 t | Sudan (former) |
| 1970s | 6,187 t | 10,361 t | 4,174 t | Sudan (former) |
| 1980s | 9,997 t | 15,171 t | 5,174 t | Sudan (former) |
| 1990s | 12,839 t | 18,042 t | 5,203 t | Sudan (former) |
| 2000s | 17,052 t | 28,787 t | 11,735 t | Sudan (former) |
| 2010s | 20,632 t | 35,700 t | 15,068 t | Sudan (former) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen, Kenya or Sudan (former)?
- Sudan (former), at 33,266 t against 31,228 t in Kenya as of 2011.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen between Kenya and Sudan (former)?
- 2,038 t, with Sudan (former) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Sudan (former)?
- 51 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2011.
- How do Kenya and Sudan (former) rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen?
- Kenya ranks 59th and Sudan (former) ranks 58th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).