Kenya vs Sweden: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Kenya
- Sweden
How they compare
Kenya currently reports 31,228 t against 29,433 t in Sweden, a difference of 1,795 t.
That makes Kenya's figure about 1.1 times Sweden's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sweden ahead.
Kenya ranks 59th and Sweden ranks 61st of 201 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kenya | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4,288 t | 37,586 t | 33,298 t | Sweden |
| 1970s | 6,187 t | 43,832 t | 37,645 t | Sweden |
| 1980s | 9,997 t | 42,770 t | 32,773 t | Sweden |
| 1990s | 12,839 t | 37,512 t | 24,673 t | Sweden |
| 2000s | 17,052 t | 32,824 t | 15,772 t | Sweden |
| 2010s | 24,570 t | 32,205 t | 7,635 t | Sweden |
| 2020s | 30,014 t | 30,735 t | 720.85 t | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen, Kenya or Sweden?
- Kenya, at 31,228 t against 29,433 t in Sweden as of 2023.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen between Kenya and Sweden?
- 1,795 t, with Kenya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Sweden?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Kenya and Sweden rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen?
- Kenya ranks 59th and Sweden ranks 61st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).