Kiribati vs Saint Lucia: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Kiribati
- Saint Lucia
How they compare
Saint Lucia currently reports 89.56 t against 68.69 t in Kiribati, a difference of 20.87 t.
That makes Saint Lucia's figure about 1.3 times Kiribati's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Saint Lucia has been ahead every year.
Kiribati ranks 187th and Saint Lucia ranks 184th of 201 countries.
Saint Lucia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Saint Lucia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 21.32 t | 97.21 t | 75.89 t | Saint Lucia |
| 1970s | 24.09 t | 179.88 t | 155.79 t | Saint Lucia |
| 1980s | 28.12 t | 197.69 t | 169.58 t | Saint Lucia |
| 1990s | 33.45 t | 184.27 t | 150.82 t | Saint Lucia |
| 2000s | 52.19 t | 91.22 t | 39.03 t | Saint Lucia |
| 2010s | 64.89 t | 91.34 t | 26.45 t | Saint Lucia |
| 2020s | 68.29 t | 89.41 t | 21.11 t | Saint Lucia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen, Kiribati or Saint Lucia?
- Saint Lucia, at 89.56 t against 68.69 t in Kiribati as of 2023.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen between Kiribati and Saint Lucia?
- 20.87 t, with Saint Lucia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Saint Lucia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Kiribati and Saint Lucia rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen?
- Kiribati ranks 187th and Saint Lucia ranks 184th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).