Kyrgyz Republic vs South Sudan: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Kyrgyz Republic
- South Sudan
How they compare
Kyrgyz Republic currently reports 12,625 t against 11,941 t in South Sudan, a difference of 684 t.
That makes Kyrgyz Republic's figure about 1.1 times South Sudan's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Kyrgyz Republic ahead.
Kyrgyz Republic ranks 94th and South Sudan ranks 95th of 185 countries.
Kyrgyz Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyz Republic | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 11,067 t | 10,486 t | 580.85 t | Kyrgyz Republic |
| 2020s | 12,473 t | 11,700 t | 772.92 t | Kyrgyz Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen, Kyrgyz Republic or South Sudan?
- Kyrgyz Republic, at 12,625 t against 11,941 t in South Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen between Kyrgyz Republic and South Sudan?
- 684 t, with Kyrgyz Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyz Republic and South Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Kyrgyz Republic and South Sudan rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen?
- Kyrgyz Republic ranks 94th and South Sudan ranks 95th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).