Kyrgyzstan vs Zimbabwe: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 13,119 t against 12,625 t in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 494 t.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 94th and Zimbabwe ranks 91st of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 9,211 t | 11,373 t | 2,162 t | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 8,779 t | 9,424 t | 645.83 t | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 10,882 t | 8,458 t | 2,425 t | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 12,473 t | 13,806 t | 1,334 t | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen, Kyrgyzstan or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 13,119 t against 12,625 t in Kyrgyzstan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen between Kyrgyzstan and Zimbabwe?
- 494 t, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Zimbabwe?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Zimbabwe rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 94th and Zimbabwe ranks 91st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).