Latvia vs Mozambique: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Latvia
- Mozambique
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 10,551 t against 9,941 t in Mozambique, a difference of 610 t.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Mozambique's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 97th and Mozambique ranks 98th of 186 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 9,291 t | 5,417 t | 3,874 t | Latvia |
| 2000s | 7,307 t | 6,563 t | 743.85 t | Latvia |
| 2010s | 9,989 t | 8,149 t | 1,841 t | Latvia |
| 2020s | 10,945 t | 10,884 t | 60.56 t | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen, Latvia or Mozambique?
- Latvia, at 10,551 t against 9,941 t in Mozambique as of 2023.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen between Latvia and Mozambique?
- 610 t, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Mozambique?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Latvia and Mozambique rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen?
- Latvia ranks 97th and Mozambique ranks 98th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).