Luxembourg vs Puerto Rico: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Luxembourg
- Puerto Rico
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 913.8 t against 882.47 t in Puerto Rico, a difference of 31.33 t.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Puerto Rico ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 160th and Puerto Rico ranks 162nd of 201 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Luxembourg averaged higher in 1 and Puerto Rico in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Puerto Rico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,007 t | 1,422 t | 415.01 t | Puerto Rico |
| 2010s | 1,116 t | 1,217 t | 101.1 t | Puerto Rico |
| 2020s | 982.87 t | 964.71 t | 18.16 t | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen, Luxembourg or Puerto Rico?
- Luxembourg, at 913.8 t against 882.47 t in Puerto Rico as of 2023.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen between Luxembourg and Puerto Rico?
- 31.33 t, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Puerto Rico?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Luxembourg and Puerto Rico rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen?
- Luxembourg ranks 160th and Puerto Rico ranks 162nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).