Maldives vs Nauru: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen

Maldives
23.79 t
in 2023
Nauru
4.15 t
in 2023
Maldives rank
197th
Nauru rank
200th

Leaching — Cropland nitrogen over time

  • Maldives
  • Nauru
010203040196119922023

How they compare

Maldives currently reports 23.79 t against 4.15 t in Nauru, a difference of 19.64 t.

That makes Maldives's figure about 5.7 times Nauru's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Nauru ahead.

Maldives ranks 197th and Nauru ranks 200th of 201 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Maldives averaged higher in 3 and Nauru in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Maldives Nauru Difference Ahead
1960s 0 t 1.6 t 1.6 t Nauru
1970s 0 t 2.18 t 2.18 t Nauru
1980s 0 t 3.03 t 3.03 t Nauru
1990s 0 t 3.8 t 3.8 t Nauru
2000s 6.55 t 3.93 t 2.62 t Maldives
2010s 25.13 t 4.12 t 21.01 t Maldives
2020s 22.79 t 4.16 t 18.63 t Maldives

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen, Maldives or Nauru?
Maldives, at 23.79 t against 4.15 t in Nauru as of 2023.
What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen between Maldives and Nauru?
19.64 t, with Maldives ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Maldives and Nauru?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Maldives and Nauru rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen?
Maldives ranks 197th and Nauru ranks 200th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).