Maldives vs Tuvalu: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen

Maldives
23.79 t
in 2023
Tuvalu
22.73 t
in 2023
Maldives rank
197th
Tuvalu rank
198th

Leaching — Cropland nitrogen over time

  • Maldives
  • Tuvalu
010203040196119922023

How they compare

Maldives currently reports 23.79 t against 22.73 t in Tuvalu, a difference of 1.06 t.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Tuvalu ahead.

Maldives ranks 197th and Tuvalu ranks 198th of 201 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Maldives averaged higher in 2 and Tuvalu in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Maldives Tuvalu Difference Ahead
1960s 0 t 7.58 t 7.58 t Tuvalu
1970s 0 t 7.71 t 7.71 t Tuvalu
1980s 0 t 11.36 t 11.36 t Tuvalu
1990s 0 t 18.22 t 18.22 t Tuvalu
2000s 6.55 t 20.78 t 14.23 t Tuvalu
2010s 25.13 t 22.14 t 2.99 t Maldives
2020s 22.79 t 22.66 t 0.1336 t Maldives

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen, Maldives or Tuvalu?
Maldives, at 23.79 t against 22.73 t in Tuvalu as of 2023.
What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen between Maldives and Tuvalu?
1.06 t, with Maldives ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Maldives and Tuvalu?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Maldives and Tuvalu rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen?
Maldives ranks 197th and Tuvalu ranks 198th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).