Mali vs Sri Lanka: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Mali
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 14,469 t against 13,585 t in Mali, a difference of 884 t.
That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.1 times Mali's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Mali ranks 95th and Sri Lanka ranks 92nd of 201 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mali | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,867 t | 7,581 t | 5,714 t | Sri Lanka |
| 1970s | 2,342 t | 8,948 t | 6,607 t | Sri Lanka |
| 1980s | 3,126 t | 12,995 t | 9,869 t | Sri Lanka |
| 1990s | 4,028 t | 15,005 t | 10,977 t | Sri Lanka |
| 2000s | 8,794 t | 19,476 t | 10,682 t | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 15,399 t | 17,387 t | 1,988 t | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 13,381 t | 17,655 t | 4,274 t | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen, Mali or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 14,469 t against 13,585 t in Mali as of 2023.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen between Mali and Sri Lanka?
- 884 t, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Sri Lanka?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Mali and Sri Lanka rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen?
- Mali ranks 95th and Sri Lanka ranks 92nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).