Mauritius vs Qatar: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Mauritius
- Qatar
How they compare
Qatar currently reports 857.26 t against 804.46 t in Mauritius, a difference of 52.8 t.
That makes Qatar's figure about 1.1 times Mauritius's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritius ahead.
Mauritius ranks 164th and Qatar ranks 163rd of 201 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Qatar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 998.39 t | 2.82 t | 995.57 t | Mauritius |
| 1970s | 1,052 t | 25.06 t | 1,027 t | Mauritius |
| 1980s | 1,149 t | 99.12 t | 1,050 t | Mauritius |
| 1990s | 1,327 t | 304.2 t | 1,023 t | Mauritius |
| 2000s | 1,158 t | 203.71 t | 954.41 t | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 1,084 t | 411.93 t | 672.36 t | Mauritius |
| 2020s | 862.32 t | 789.36 t | 72.97 t | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen, Mauritius or Qatar?
- Qatar, at 857.26 t against 804.46 t in Mauritius as of 2023.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen between Mauritius and Qatar?
- 52.8 t, with Qatar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Qatar?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Mauritius and Qatar rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen?
- Mauritius ranks 164th and Qatar ranks 163rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).