Mexico vs Viet Nam: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Mexico
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Viet Nam currently reports 242,668 t against 220,060 t in Mexico, a difference of 22,608 t.
That makes Viet Nam's figure about 1.1 times Mexico's.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mexico ahead.
Mexico ranks 15th and Viet Nam ranks 12th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Mexico averaged higher in 6 and Viet Nam in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mexico | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 59,129 t | 23,738 t | 35,392 t | Mexico |
| 1970s | 109,502 t | 36,233 t | 73,268 t | Mexico |
| 1980s | 178,541 t | 54,952 t | 123,589 t | Mexico |
| 1990s | 177,674 t | 116,472 t | 61,202 t | Mexico |
| 2000s | 176,250 t | 166,267 t | 9,983 t | Mexico |
| 2010s | 204,519 t | 199,830 t | 4,688 t | Mexico |
| 2020s | 209,944 t | 231,187 t | 21,243 t | Viet Nam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen, Mexico or Viet Nam?
- Viet Nam, at 242,668 t against 220,060 t in Mexico as of 2023.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen between Mexico and Viet Nam?
- 22,608 t, with Viet Nam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Viet Nam?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Mexico and Viet Nam rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen?
- Mexico ranks 15th and Viet Nam ranks 12th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).