Micronesia (Federated States of) vs Spain: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Micronesia (Federated States of)
- Spain
How they compare
Spain currently reports 174,026 t against 79.66 t in Micronesia (Federated States of), a difference of 173,946 t.
That makes Spain's figure about 2,184.7 times Micronesia (Federated States of)'s.
Across all 33 years both countries report, Spain has been ahead every year.
Micronesia (Federated States of) ranks 18th and Spain ranks 17th of 18 countries.
Spain has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Micronesia (Federated States of) | Spain | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 65.92 t | 191,916 t | 191,850 t | Spain |
| 2000s | 68.1 t | 202,277 t | 202,209 t | Spain |
| 2010s | 74.54 t | 200,863 t | 200,789 t | Spain |
| 2020s | 78.58 t | 193,411 t | 193,332 t | Spain |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen, Micronesia (Federated States of) or Spain?
- Spain, at 174,026 t against 79.66 t in Micronesia (Federated States of) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen between Micronesia (Federated States of) and Spain?
- 173,946 t, with Spain ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Micronesia (Federated States of) and Spain?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.
- How do Micronesia (Federated States of) and Spain rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen?
- Micronesia (Federated States of) ranks 18th and Spain ranks 17th of 18 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).