Middle Africa vs Philippines: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Middle Africa
- Philippines
How they compare
Philippines currently reports 97,042 t against 55,835 t in Middle Africa, a difference of 41,207 t.
That makes Philippines's figure about 1.7 times Middle Africa's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Philippines has been ahead every year.
Middle Africa ranks 29th and Philippines ranks 29th of 32 groups.
Philippines has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Middle Africa | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 7,642 t | 25,818 t | 18,176 t | Philippines |
| 1970s | 12,257 t | 38,038 t | 25,782 t | Philippines |
| 1980s | 17,234 t | 48,165 t | 30,931 t | Philippines |
| 1990s | 20,267 t | 66,225 t | 45,959 t | Philippines |
| 2000s | 27,128 t | 80,849 t | 53,721 t | Philippines |
| 2010s | 43,449 t | 91,527 t | 48,078 t | Philippines |
| 2020s | 53,243 t | 104,625 t | 51,381 t | Philippines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen, Middle Africa or Philippines?
- Philippines, at 97,042 t against 55,835 t in Middle Africa as of 2023.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen between Middle Africa and Philippines?
- 41,207 t, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Middle Africa and Philippines?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Middle Africa and Philippines rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen?
- Middle Africa ranks 29th and Philippines ranks 29th of 32 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).