Northern Europe vs Uzbekistan: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Northern Europe
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Northern Europe currently reports 316,552 t against 162,411 t in Uzbekistan, a difference of 154,141 t.
That makes Northern Europe's figure about 1.9 times Uzbekistan's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Northern Europe has been ahead every year.
Northern Europe ranks 19th and Uzbekistan ranks 19th of 29 groups.
Northern Europe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Northern Europe | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 403,027 t | 102,074 t | 300,953 t | Northern Europe |
| 2000s | 349,871 t | 84,751 t | 265,120 t | Northern Europe |
| 2010s | 343,503 t | 119,257 t | 224,246 t | Northern Europe |
| 2020s | 332,766 t | 154,174 t | 178,592 t | Northern Europe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen, Northern Europe or Uzbekistan?
- Northern Europe, at 316,552 t against 162,411 t in Uzbekistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen between Northern Europe and Uzbekistan?
- 154,141 t, with Northern Europe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Northern Europe and Uzbekistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Northern Europe and Uzbekistan rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen?
- Northern Europe ranks 19th and Uzbekistan ranks 19th of 29 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).