Panama vs Togo: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Panama
- Togo
How they compare
Panama currently reports 7,479 t against 7,068 t in Togo, a difference of 411 t.
That makes Panama's figure about 1.1 times Togo's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Panama ahead.
Panama ranks 114th and Togo ranks 116th of 201 countries.
Panama has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Panama | Togo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2,226 t | 725.96 t | 1,500 t | Panama |
| 1970s | 2,618 t | 901.36 t | 1,717 t | Panama |
| 1980s | 3,252 t | 1,280 t | 1,972 t | Panama |
| 1990s | 4,258 t | 1,949 t | 2,309 t | Panama |
| 2000s | 4,298 t | 2,194 t | 2,104 t | Panama |
| 2010s | 4,970 t | 4,037 t | 932.92 t | Panama |
| 2020s | 6,724 t | 5,604 t | 1,120 t | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen, Panama or Togo?
- Panama, at 7,479 t against 7,068 t in Togo as of 2023.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen between Panama and Togo?
- 411 t, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Togo?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Panama and Togo rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen?
- Panama ranks 114th and Togo ranks 116th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).