Paraguay vs Tajikistan: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen

Paraguay
21,116 t
in 2023
Tajikistan
20,194 t
in 2023
Paraguay rank
78th
Tajikistan rank
79th

Leaching — Cropland nitrogen over time

  • Paraguay
  • Tajikistan
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k25.0k196119922023

How they compare

Paraguay currently reports 21,116 t against 20,194 t in Tajikistan, a difference of 922 t.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Tajikistan ahead.

Paraguay ranks 78th and Tajikistan ranks 79th of 201 countries.

Paraguay has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Paraguay Tajikistan Difference Ahead
1990s 10,278 t 9,348 t 929.26 t Paraguay
2000s 11,372 t 7,327 t 4,046 t Paraguay
2010s 18,784 t 12,267 t 6,518 t Paraguay
2020s 21,385 t 19,999 t 1,386 t Paraguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen, Paraguay or Tajikistan?
Paraguay, at 21,116 t against 20,194 t in Tajikistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen between Paraguay and Tajikistan?
922 t, with Paraguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Paraguay and Tajikistan?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Paraguay and Tajikistan rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen?
Paraguay ranks 78th and Tajikistan ranks 79th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).