Philippines vs Yugoslav SFR: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Philippines
- Yugoslav SFR
How they compare
Philippines currently reports 97,042 t against 83,798 t in Yugoslav SFR, a difference of 13,244 t.
That makes Philippines's figure about 1.2 times Yugoslav SFR's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Yugoslav SFR has been ahead every year.
Philippines ranks 29th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 31st of 201 countries.
Yugoslav SFR has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Philippines | Yugoslav SFR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 25,818 t | 72,198 t | 46,380 t | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1970s | 38,038 t | 94,977 t | 56,939 t | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1980s | 48,165 t | 109,426 t | 61,260 t | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1990s | 56,782 t | 91,656 t | 34,875 t | Yugoslav SFR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen, Philippines or Yugoslav SFR?
- Philippines, at 97,042 t against 83,798 t in Yugoslav SFR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen between Philippines and Yugoslav SFR?
- 13,244 t, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and Yugoslav SFR?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
- How do Philippines and Yugoslav SFR rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen?
- Philippines ranks 29th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 31st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).