Poland vs Uzbekistan: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen

Poland
157,596 t
in 2023
Uzbekistan
162,411 t
in 2023
Poland rank
23rd
Uzbekistan rank
21st

Leaching — Cropland nitrogen over time

  • Poland
  • Uzbekistan
100.0k150.0k200.0k196119922023

How they compare

Uzbekistan currently reports 162,411 t against 157,596 t in Poland, a difference of 4,815 t.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Poland ahead.

Poland ranks 23rd and Uzbekistan ranks 21st of 201 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Poland averaged higher in 3 and Uzbekistan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Poland Uzbekistan Difference Ahead
1990s 140,320 t 102,074 t 38,246 t Poland
2000s 142,571 t 84,751 t 57,820 t Poland
2010s 149,312 t 119,257 t 30,055 t Poland
2020s 145,905 t 154,174 t 8,269 t Uzbekistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen, Poland or Uzbekistan?
Uzbekistan, at 162,411 t against 157,596 t in Poland as of 2023.
What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen between Poland and Uzbekistan?
4,815 t, with Uzbekistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Uzbekistan?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Poland and Uzbekistan rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen?
Poland ranks 23rd and Uzbekistan ranks 21st of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).