Russian Federation vs South America: Leaching β Cropland nitrogen
Leaching β Cropland nitrogen over time
- Russian Federation
- South America
How they compare
South America currently reports 1.37 million t against 452,281 t in Russian Federation, a difference of 914,889 t.
That makes South America's figure about 3.0 times Russian Federation's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Russian Federation ahead.
Russian Federation ranks 8th and South America ranks 5th of 185 countries.
South America has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Russian Federation | South America | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 526,406 t | 648,917 t | 122,511 t | South America |
| 2000s | 341,569 t | 858,638 t | 517,069 t | South America |
| 2010s | 364,489 t | 1.13 million t | 767,821 t | South America |
| 2020s | 439,966 t | 1.41 million t | 968,532 t | South America |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching β cropland nitrogen, Russian Federation or South America?
- South America, at 1.37 million t against 452,281 t in Russian Federation as of 2023.
- What is the difference in leaching β cropland nitrogen between Russian Federation and South America?
- 914,889 t, with South America ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Russian Federation and South America?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Russian Federation and South America rank globally for leaching β cropland nitrogen?
- Russian Federation ranks 8th and South America ranks 5th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching β Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).