Rwanda vs Slovenia: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Rwanda
- Slovenia
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 4,195 t against 3,705 t in Slovenia, a difference of 490 t.
That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.1 times Slovenia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Slovenia ahead.
Rwanda ranks 131st and Slovenia ranks 133rd of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 2 and Slovenia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 727 t | 5,340 t | 4,613 t | Slovenia |
| 2000s | 1,698 t | 4,511 t | 2,814 t | Slovenia |
| 2010s | 4,644 t | 4,030 t | 613.72 t | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 4,953 t | 3,968 t | 984.6 t | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen, Rwanda or Slovenia?
- Rwanda, at 4,195 t against 3,705 t in Slovenia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen between Rwanda and Slovenia?
- 490 t, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Slovenia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Rwanda and Slovenia rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen?
- Rwanda ranks 131st and Slovenia ranks 133rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).