Sao Tome and Principe vs Tonga: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Sao Tome and Principe
- Tonga
How they compare
Tonga currently reports 144.98 t against 143.64 t in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 1.34 t.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Tonga has been ahead every year.
Sao Tome and Principe ranks 166th and Tonga ranks 165th of 185 countries.
Tonga has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sao Tome and Principe | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 15.2 t | 43.93 t | 28.73 t | Tonga |
| 1970s | 12.44 t | 83.65 t | 71.21 t | Tonga |
| 1980s | 10.23 t | 146.75 t | 136.53 t | Tonga |
| 1990s | 12.17 t | 133.53 t | 121.36 t | Tonga |
| 2000s | 45.37 t | 133.81 t | 88.44 t | Tonga |
| 2010s | 110.3 t | 141.75 t | 31.45 t | Tonga |
| 2020s | 135.93 t | 145.66 t | 9.73 t | Tonga |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen, Sao Tome and Principe or Tonga?
- Tonga, at 144.98 t against 143.64 t in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen between Sao Tome and Principe and Tonga?
- 1.34 t, with Tonga ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sao Tome and Principe and Tonga?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Sao Tome and Principe and Tonga rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen?
- Sao Tome and Principe ranks 166th and Tonga ranks 165th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).