Seychelles vs Tuvalu: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Seychelles
- Tuvalu
How they compare
Seychelles currently reports 31.32 t against 22.73 t in Tuvalu, a difference of 8.59 t.
That makes Seychelles's figure about 1.4 times Tuvalu's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Seychelles ahead.
Seychelles ranks 196th and Tuvalu ranks 198th of 201 countries.
Seychelles has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Seychelles | Tuvalu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 10.52 t | 7.58 t | 2.94 t | Seychelles |
| 1970s | 28.63 t | 7.71 t | 20.92 t | Seychelles |
| 1980s | 56.88 t | 11.36 t | 45.52 t | Seychelles |
| 1990s | 59.18 t | 18.22 t | 40.96 t | Seychelles |
| 2000s | 29.85 t | 20.78 t | 9.08 t | Seychelles |
| 2010s | 23.17 t | 22.14 t | 1.04 t | Seychelles |
| 2020s | 29.93 t | 22.66 t | 7.28 t | Seychelles |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen, Seychelles or Tuvalu?
- Seychelles, at 31.32 t against 22.73 t in Tuvalu as of 2023.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen between Seychelles and Tuvalu?
- 8.59 t, with Seychelles ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Seychelles and Tuvalu?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Seychelles and Tuvalu rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen?
- Seychelles ranks 196th and Tuvalu ranks 198th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).