Slovenia vs Yemen: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen

Slovenia
3,705 t
in 2023
Yemen
3,097 t
in 2023
Slovenia rank
133rd
Yemen rank
136th

Leaching — Cropland nitrogen over time

  • Slovenia
  • Yemen
02.0k4.0k6.0k196119922023

How they compare

Slovenia currently reports 3,705 t against 3,097 t in Yemen, a difference of 608 t.

That makes Slovenia's figure about 1.2 times Yemen's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Slovenia ahead.

Slovenia ranks 133rd and Yemen ranks 136th of 201 countries.

Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Slovenia Yemen Difference Ahead
1990s 5,340 t 2,313 t 3,027 t Slovenia
2000s 4,511 t 3,042 t 1,470 t Slovenia
2010s 4,030 t 3,673 t 356.6 t Slovenia
2020s 3,968 t 2,969 t 999.38 t Slovenia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen, Slovenia or Yemen?
Slovenia, at 3,705 t against 3,097 t in Yemen as of 2023.
What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen between Slovenia and Yemen?
608 t, with Slovenia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Slovenia and Yemen?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Slovenia and Yemen rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen?
Slovenia ranks 133rd and Yemen ranks 136th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).