Small island developing States (SIDS) vs United Republic of Tanzania: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen

Small island developing States (SIDS)
62,228 t
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
36,350 t
in 2023
Small island developing States (SIDS) rank
6th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
9th

Leaching — Cropland nitrogen over time

  • Small island developing States (SIDS)
  • United Republic of Tanzania
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k196119922023

How they compare

Small island developing States (SIDS) currently reports 62,228 t against 36,350 t in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 25,878 t.

That makes Small island developing States (SIDS)'s figure about 1.7 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Small island developing States (SIDS) has been ahead every year.

Small island developing States (SIDS) ranks 6th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 9th of 18 groups.

Small island developing States (SIDS) has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Small island developing States (SIDS) United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 42,275 t 3,923 t 38,352 t Small island developing States (SIDS)
1970s 56,953 t 5,765 t 51,188 t Small island developing States (SIDS)
1980s 68,866 t 8,066 t 60,800 t Small island developing States (SIDS)
1990s 57,996 t 9,482 t 48,513 t Small island developing States (SIDS)
2000s 54,326 t 13,145 t 41,181 t Small island developing States (SIDS)
2010s 63,653 t 22,021 t 41,632 t Small island developing States (SIDS)
2020s 64,604 t 32,059 t 32,545 t Small island developing States (SIDS)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen, Small island developing States (SIDS) or United Republic of Tanzania?
Small island developing States (SIDS), at 62,228 t against 36,350 t in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2023.
What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen between Small island developing States (SIDS) and United Republic of Tanzania?
25,878 t, with Small island developing States (SIDS) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Small island developing States (SIDS) and United Republic of Tanzania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Small island developing States (SIDS) and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen?
Small island developing States (SIDS) ranks 6th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 9th of 18 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Small island developing States (SIDS) vs United Republic of Tanzania: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 30 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/leaching-cropland-nitrogen/small-island-developing-states-sids/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/leaching-cropland-nitrogen/small-island-developing-states-sids/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Small island developing States (SIDS) vs United Republic of Tanzania: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).