Sudan (former) vs Sweden: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Sudan (former)
- Sweden
How they compare
Sudan (former) currently reports 33,266 t against 29,433 t in Sweden, a difference of 3,833 t.
That makes Sudan (former)'s figure about 1.1 times Sweden's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 51 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sweden ahead.
Sudan (former) ranks 58th and Sweden ranks 61st of 201 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Sudan (former) averaged higher in 1 and Sweden in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sudan (former) | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 6,887 t | 37,586 t | 30,699 t | Sweden |
| 1970s | 10,361 t | 43,832 t | 33,471 t | Sweden |
| 1980s | 15,171 t | 42,770 t | 27,599 t | Sweden |
| 1990s | 18,042 t | 37,512 t | 19,470 t | Sweden |
| 2000s | 28,787 t | 32,824 t | 4,037 t | Sweden |
| 2010s | 35,700 t | 31,545 t | 4,155 t | Sudan (former) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen, Sudan (former) or Sweden?
- Sudan (former), at 33,266 t against 29,433 t in Sweden as of 2011.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen between Sudan (former) and Sweden?
- 3,833 t, with Sudan (former) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sudan (former) and Sweden?
- 51 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2011.
- How do Sudan (former) and Sweden rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen?
- Sudan (former) ranks 58th and Sweden ranks 61st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).