Switzerland vs Zimbabwe: Leaching — Cropland nitrogen
Leaching — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Switzerland
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 13,119 t against 12,883 t in Switzerland, a difference of 236 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Switzerland ahead.
Switzerland ranks 99th and Zimbabwe ranks 98th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Switzerland averaged higher in 6 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Switzerland | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 14,302 t | 4,827 t | 9,475 t | Switzerland |
| 1970s | 16,701 t | 8,670 t | 8,031 t | Switzerland |
| 1980s | 17,858 t | 10,990 t | 6,868 t | Switzerland |
| 1990s | 15,948 t | 11,531 t | 4,417 t | Switzerland |
| 2000s | 14,111 t | 9,424 t | 4,687 t | Switzerland |
| 2010s | 13,691 t | 8,458 t | 5,233 t | Switzerland |
| 2020s | 12,940 t | 13,806 t | 865.98 t | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland nitrogen, Switzerland or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 13,119 t against 12,883 t in Switzerland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland nitrogen between Switzerland and Zimbabwe?
- 236 t, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Switzerland and Zimbabwe?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Switzerland and Zimbabwe rank globally for leaching — cropland nitrogen?
- Switzerland ranks 99th and Zimbabwe ranks 98th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).