Australia and New Zealand vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Leaching — Cropland phosphorus

Australia and New Zealand
0 t
in 2023
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
0 t
in 2023
Australia and New Zealand rank
1st
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
1st

Leaching — Cropland phosphorus over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
00.20.40.60.81196119922023

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), a difference of 0 t.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has been ahead every year.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 1st and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 1st of 1 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Difference Ahead
1960s 0 t 0 t 0 t
1970s 0 t 0 t 0 t
1980s 0 t 0 t 0 t
1990s 0 t 0 t 0 t
2000s 0 t 0 t 0 t
2010s 0 t 0 t 0 t
2020s 0 t 0 t 0 t

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher leaching — cropland phosphorus, Australia and New Zealand or Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
Australia and New Zealand, at 0 t against 0 t in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) as of 2023.
What is the difference in leaching — cropland phosphorus between Australia and New Zealand and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
0 t, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank globally for leaching — cropland phosphorus?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 1st and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 1st of 1 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Leaching — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/leaching-cropland-phosphorus/australia-and-new-zealand/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/leaching-cropland-phosphorus/australia-and-new-zealand/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/">Australia and New Zealand vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Leaching — Cropland phosphorus</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Leaching — Cropland phosphorus
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
33 places, 2,079 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).