Melanesia vs South America: Leaching — Cropland phosphorus
Leaching — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Melanesia
- South America
How they compare
Melanesia currently reports 0 t against 0 t in South America, a difference of 0 t.
Across all 63 years both countries report, South America has been ahead every year.
Melanesia ranks 1st and South America ranks 1st of 23 regions.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Melanesia | South America | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
| 1970s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
| 1980s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
| 1990s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
| 2000s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
| 2010s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
| 2020s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland phosphorus, Melanesia or South America?
- Melanesia, at 0 t against 0 t in South America as of 2023.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland phosphorus between Melanesia and South America?
- 0 t, with Melanesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Melanesia and South America?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Melanesia and South America rank globally for leaching — cropland phosphorus?
- Melanesia ranks 1st and South America ranks 1st of 23 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).