Eastern Asia vs Melanesia: Leaching — Cropland potassium
Leaching — Cropland potassium over time
- Eastern Asia
- Melanesia
How they compare
Eastern Asia currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Melanesia, a difference of 0 t.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Melanesia has been ahead every year.
Eastern Asia ranks 1st and Melanesia ranks 1st of 29 groups.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eastern Asia | Melanesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
| 1970s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
| 1980s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
| 1990s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
| 2000s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
| 2010s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
| 2020s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland potassium, Eastern Asia or Melanesia?
- Eastern Asia, at 0 t against 0 t in Melanesia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland potassium between Eastern Asia and Melanesia?
- 0 t, with Eastern Asia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eastern Asia and Melanesia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Eastern Asia and Melanesia rank globally for leaching — cropland potassium?
- Eastern Asia ranks 1st and Melanesia ranks 1st of 29 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).