Polynesia vs Western Asia: Leaching — Cropland potassium
Leaching — Cropland potassium over time
- Polynesia
- Western Asia
How they compare
Polynesia currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Western Asia, a difference of 0 t.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Western Asia has been ahead every year.
Polynesia ranks 1st and Western Asia ranks 1st of 4 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Polynesia | Western Asia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
| 1970s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
| 1980s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
| 1990s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
| 2000s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
| 2010s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
| 2020s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher leaching — cropland potassium, Polynesia or Western Asia?
- Polynesia, at 0 t against 0 t in Western Asia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in leaching — cropland potassium between Polynesia and Western Asia?
- 0 t, with Polynesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Polynesia and Western Asia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Polynesia and Western Asia rank globally for leaching — cropland potassium?
- Polynesia ranks 1st and Western Asia ranks 1st of 4 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Leaching — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).