China vs Zimbabwe: Level of water stress: freshwater withdrawal as a proportion of

China
41.52
in 2022
Zimbabwe
46.09
in 2022
China rank
44th
Zimbabwe rank
41st

Level of water stress: freshwater withdrawal as a proportion of over time

  • China
  • Zimbabwe
1020304050198020012022

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 46.09 against 41.52 in China, a difference of 4.57.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times China's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 36 shared years of data; in 1987 it was China ahead.

China ranks 44th and Zimbabwe ranks 41st of 178 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, China averaged higher in 4 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1980s 35.96 13.32 22.64 China
1990s 38.56 25.46 13.1 China
2000s 40.98 35.87 5.11 China
2010s 43.48 33.28 10.2 China
2020s 41.52 46.09 4.57 Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher level of water stress: freshwater withdrawal as a proportion of, China or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 46.09 against 41.52 in China as of 2022.
What is the difference in level of water stress: freshwater withdrawal as a proportion of between China and Zimbabwe?
4.57, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Zimbabwe?
36 years are reported by both, from 1987 to 2022.
How do China and Zimbabwe rank globally for level of water stress: freshwater withdrawal as a proportion of?
China ranks 44th and Zimbabwe ranks 41st of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Level of water stress: freshwater withdrawal as a proportion of available freshwater resources. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Zimbabwe: Level of water stress: freshwater withdrawal as a proportion of. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/level-of-water-stress-freshwater-withdrawal-as-a-proportion-of-available-freshwater/china/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/level-of-water-stress-freshwater-withdrawal-as-a-proportion-of-available-freshwater/china/zimbabwe/">China vs Zimbabwe: Level of water stress: freshwater withdrawal as a proportion of</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Level of water stress: freshwater withdrawal as a proportion of available freshwater resources
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
178 places, 6,200 data points, 1962–2022
Last refreshed

The level of water stress: freshwater withdrawal as a proportion of available freshwater resources is the ratio between total freshwater withdrawn by all major sectors and total renewable freshwater resources, after taking into account environmental water requirements. Main sectors, as defined by ISIC standards, include agriculture; forestry and fishing; manufacturing; electricity industry; and services. This indicator is also known as water withdrawal intensity.