Guinea vs Latvia: Level of water stress: freshwater withdrawal as a proportion of
Level of water stress: freshwater withdrawal as a proportion of over time
- Guinea
- Latvia
How they compare
Guinea currently reports 1.37 against 1.02 in Latvia, a difference of 0.35.
That makes Guinea's figure about 1.3 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 28 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Latvia ahead.
Guinea ranks 160th and Latvia ranks 163rd of 178 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.9467 | 2.12 | 1.17 | Latvia |
| 2000s | 0.9145 | 1.49 | 0.5793 | Latvia |
| 2010s | 1.23 | 1.3 | 0.0634 | Latvia |
| 2020s | 1.37 | 1.06 | 0.3125 | Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher level of water stress: freshwater withdrawal as a proportion of, Guinea or Latvia?
- Guinea, at 1.37 against 1.02 in Latvia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in level of water stress: freshwater withdrawal as a proportion of between Guinea and Latvia?
- 0.35, with Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Latvia?
- 28 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2022.
- How do Guinea and Latvia rank globally for level of water stress: freshwater withdrawal as a proportion of?
- Guinea ranks 160th and Latvia ranks 163rd of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Level of water stress: freshwater withdrawal as a proportion of available freshwater resources. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The level of water stress: freshwater withdrawal as a proportion of available freshwater resources is the ratio between total freshwater withdrawn by all major sectors and total renewable freshwater resources, after taking into account environmental water requirements. Main sectors, as defined by ISIC standards, include agriculture; forestry and fishing; manufacturing; electricity industry; and services. This indicator is also known as water withdrawal intensity.