Finland vs Zimbabwe: Liquid biofuels — Energy consumption
Liquid biofuels — Energy consumption over time
- Finland
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 2,104 TJ against 1,860 TJ in Finland, a difference of 244 TJ.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Finland's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Finland ahead.
Finland ranks 45th and Zimbabwe ranks 42nd of 68 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 14,534 TJ | 1,431 TJ | 13,103 TJ | Finland |
| 2020s | 17,372 TJ | 2,018 TJ | 15,354 TJ | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher liquid biofuels — energy consumption, Finland or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 2,104 TJ against 1,860 TJ in Finland as of 2024.
- What is the difference in liquid biofuels — energy consumption between Finland and Zimbabwe?
- 244 TJ, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Zimbabwe?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2024.
- How do Finland and Zimbabwe rank globally for liquid biofuels — energy consumption?
- Finland ranks 45th and Zimbabwe ranks 42nd of 68 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Liquid biofuels — Energy consumption. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain Bioenergy contains data on bioenergy use and bioenergy production, covering the following items: i) animal waste, ii) bagasse, iii) bio jet kerosene, iv) biodiesel, v) biogases, vi) biogasoline, vii) black liquor, viii) charcoal, ix) fuelwood, x) other liquid biofuels, xi) other vegetal material and residues.