Australia and New Zealand vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Major livestock types — Stocks
Major livestock types — Stocks over time
- Australia and New Zealand
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
How they compare
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 328.16 million LSU against 47.76 million LSU in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 280.40 million LSU.
That makes Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s figure about 6.9 times Australia and New Zealand's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has been ahead every year.
Australia and New Zealand ranks 10th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 7th of 195 countries.
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia and New Zealand | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 46.31 million LSU | 96.89 million LSU | 50.58 million LSU | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 1970s | 56.28 million LSU | 112.59 million LSU | 56.31 million LSU | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 1980s | 51.03 million LSU | 129.77 million LSU | 78.74 million LSU | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 1990s | 51.05 million LSU | 153.47 million LSU | 102.42 million LSU | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2000s | 49.30 million LSU | 199.01 million LSU | 149.71 million LSU | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2010s | 46.00 million LSU | 268.68 million LSU | 222.67 million LSU | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2020s | 43.89 million LSU | 320.36 million LSU | 276.46 million LSU | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher major livestock types — stocks, Australia and New Zealand or Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 328.16 million LSU against 47.76 million LSU in Australia and New Zealand as of 2023.
- What is the difference in major livestock types — stocks between Australia and New Zealand and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- 280.40 million LSU, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Australia and New Zealand and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank globally for major livestock types — stocks?
- Australia and New Zealand ranks 10th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 7th of 195 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Major livestock types — Stocks. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Livestock Patterns domain of FAOSTAT contains data on livestock numbers, shares of major livestock species and densities of livestock units in the agricultural land area. Values are calculated using Livestock Units (LSU), which facilitate aggregating information for different livestock types. Data are available by country, with global coverage, for the period 1961 to the most recent year available with annual updates. This methodology applies the LSU coefficients reported in the "Guidelines for the preparation of livestock sector reviews" (FAO, 2011). From this publication, LSU coefficients are computed by livestock type and by country. The reference unit used for the calculation of livestock units (=1 LSU) is the grazing equivalent of one adult dairy cow producing 3000 kg of milk annually, fed without additional concentrated foodstuffs. FAOSTAT agri-environmental indicators on livestock patterns closely follow the structure of the indicators in EUROSTAT.