Australia vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Major livestock types — Stocks

Australia
36.40 million LSU
in 2023
Sub-Saharan Africa
315.21 million LSU
in 2023
Australia rank
14th
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
9th

Major livestock types — Stocks over time

  • Australia
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
0100.0M200.0M300.0M196119922023

How they compare

Sub-Saharan Africa currently reports 315.21 million LSU against 36.40 million LSU in Australia, a difference of 278.81 million LSU.

That makes Sub-Saharan Africa's figure about 8.7 times Australia's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Sub-Saharan Africa has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 14th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 9th of 195 countries.

Sub-Saharan Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Sub-Saharan Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 34.09 million LSU 96.63 million LSU 62.54 million LSU Sub-Saharan Africa
1970s 42.32 million LSU 110.89 million LSU 68.58 million LSU Sub-Saharan Africa
1980s 36.83 million LSU 127.82 million LSU 90.99 million LSU Sub-Saharan Africa
1990s 37.96 million LSU 142.96 million LSU 105.00 million LSU Sub-Saharan Africa
2000s 36.50 million LSU 179.65 million LSU 143.15 million LSU Sub-Saharan Africa
2010s 33.63 million LSU 251.15 million LSU 217.52 million LSU Sub-Saharan Africa
2020s 32.12 million LSU 304.68 million LSU 272.55 million LSU Sub-Saharan Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher major livestock types — stocks, Australia or Sub-Saharan Africa?
Sub-Saharan Africa, at 315.21 million LSU against 36.40 million LSU in Australia as of 2023.
What is the difference in major livestock types — stocks between Australia and Sub-Saharan Africa?
278.81 million LSU, with Sub-Saharan Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Sub-Saharan Africa?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for major livestock types — stocks?
Australia ranks 14th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 9th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Major livestock types — Stocks. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Major livestock types — Stocks. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/major-livestock-types-stocks/australia/sub-saharan-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/major-livestock-types-stocks/australia/sub-saharan-africa/">Australia vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Major livestock types — Stocks</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Major livestock types — Stocks
Unit
LSU
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
246 places, 14,138 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Patterns domain of FAOSTAT contains data on livestock numbers, shares of major livestock species and densities of livestock units in the agricultural land area. Values are calculated using Livestock Units (LSU), which facilitate aggregating information for different livestock types. Data are available by country, with global coverage, for the period 1961 to the most recent year available with annual updates. This methodology applies the LSU coefficients reported in the "Guidelines for the preparation of livestock sector reviews" (FAO, 2011). From this publication, LSU coefficients are computed by livestock type and by country. The reference unit used for the calculation of livestock units (=1 LSU) is the grazing equivalent of one adult dairy cow producing 3000 kg of milk annually, fed without additional concentrated foodstuffs. FAOSTAT agri-environmental indicators on livestock patterns closely follow the structure of the indicators in EUROSTAT.