Bangladesh vs Middle Africa: Major livestock types — Stocks

Bangladesh
19.46 million LSU
in 2023
Middle Africa
53.23 million LSU
in 2023
Bangladesh rank
23rd
Middle Africa rank
3rd

Major livestock types — Stocks over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Middle Africa
10.0M20.0M30.0M40.0M50.0M196119922023

How they compare

Middle Africa currently reports 53.23 million LSU against 19.46 million LSU in Bangladesh, a difference of 33.77 million LSU.

That makes Middle Africa's figure about 2.7 times Bangladesh's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Bangladesh ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 23rd and Middle Africa ranks 3rd of 195 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 3 and Middle Africa in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Middle Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 12.93 million LSU 6.69 million LSU 6.24 million LSU Bangladesh
1970s 15.34 million LSU 8.41 million LSU 6.93 million LSU Bangladesh
1980s 13.55 million LSU 11.78 million LSU 1.76 million LSU Bangladesh
1990s 15.95 million LSU 16.49 million LSU 537,400 LSU Middle Africa
2000s 16.17 million LSU 23.83 million LSU 7.66 million LSU Middle Africa
2010s 17.95 million LSU 36.67 million LSU 18.72 million LSU Middle Africa
2020s 19.18 million LSU 49.56 million LSU 30.37 million LSU Middle Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher major livestock types — stocks, Bangladesh or Middle Africa?
Middle Africa, at 53.23 million LSU against 19.46 million LSU in Bangladesh as of 2023.
What is the difference in major livestock types — stocks between Bangladesh and Middle Africa?
33.77 million LSU, with Middle Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Middle Africa?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Bangladesh and Middle Africa rank globally for major livestock types — stocks?
Bangladesh ranks 23rd and Middle Africa ranks 3rd of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Major livestock types — Stocks. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Middle Africa: Major livestock types — Stocks. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/major-livestock-types-stocks/bangladesh/middle-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/major-livestock-types-stocks/bangladesh/middle-africa/">Bangladesh vs Middle Africa: Major livestock types — Stocks</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Major livestock types — Stocks
Unit
LSU
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
246 places, 14,138 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Patterns domain of FAOSTAT contains data on livestock numbers, shares of major livestock species and densities of livestock units in the agricultural land area. Values are calculated using Livestock Units (LSU), which facilitate aggregating information for different livestock types. Data are available by country, with global coverage, for the period 1961 to the most recent year available with annual updates. This methodology applies the LSU coefficients reported in the "Guidelines for the preparation of livestock sector reviews" (FAO, 2011). From this publication, LSU coefficients are computed by livestock type and by country. The reference unit used for the calculation of livestock units (=1 LSU) is the grazing equivalent of one adult dairy cow producing 3000 kg of milk annually, fed without additional concentrated foodstuffs. FAOSTAT agri-environmental indicators on livestock patterns closely follow the structure of the indicators in EUROSTAT.