Equatorial Guinea vs Sao Tome and Principe: Major livestock types — Stocks

Equatorial Guinea
13,230 LSU
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
12,897 LSU
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea rank
181st
Sao Tome and Principe rank
182nd

Major livestock types — Stocks over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Sao Tome and Principe
2.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k12.5k196119922023

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 13,230 LSU against 12,897 LSU in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 333 LSU.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 181st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 182nd of 195 countries.

Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1960s 6,116 LSU 3,683 LSU 2,433 LSU Equatorial Guinea
1970s 7,632 LSU 3,123 LSU 4,509 LSU Equatorial Guinea
1980s 9,087 LSU 3,741 LSU 5,346 LSU Equatorial Guinea
1990s 10,616 LSU 5,453 LSU 5,163 LSU Equatorial Guinea
2000s 11,700 LSU 8,689 LSU 3,011 LSU Equatorial Guinea
2010s 12,568 LSU 11,049 LSU 1,519 LSU Equatorial Guinea
2020s 13,142 LSU 12,815 LSU 326.85 LSU Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher major livestock types — stocks, Equatorial Guinea or Sao Tome and Principe?
Equatorial Guinea, at 13,230 LSU against 12,897 LSU in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2023.
What is the difference in major livestock types — stocks between Equatorial Guinea and Sao Tome and Principe?
333 LSU, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Sao Tome and Principe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for major livestock types — stocks?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 181st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 182nd of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Major livestock types — Stocks. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Sao Tome and Principe: Major livestock types — Stocks. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/major-livestock-types-stocks/equatorial-guinea/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/major-livestock-types-stocks/equatorial-guinea/sao-tome-and-principe/">Equatorial Guinea vs Sao Tome and Principe: Major livestock types — Stocks</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Major livestock types — Stocks
Unit
LSU
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
246 places, 14,138 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Patterns domain of FAOSTAT contains data on livestock numbers, shares of major livestock species and densities of livestock units in the agricultural land area. Values are calculated using Livestock Units (LSU), which facilitate aggregating information for different livestock types. Data are available by country, with global coverage, for the period 1961 to the most recent year available with annual updates. This methodology applies the LSU coefficients reported in the "Guidelines for the preparation of livestock sector reviews" (FAO, 2011). From this publication, LSU coefficients are computed by livestock type and by country. The reference unit used for the calculation of livestock units (=1 LSU) is the grazing equivalent of one adult dairy cow producing 3000 kg of milk annually, fed without additional concentrated foodstuffs. FAOSTAT agri-environmental indicators on livestock patterns closely follow the structure of the indicators in EUROSTAT.