French Polynesia vs Solomon Islands: Major livestock types β€” Stocks

French Polynesia
17,443 LSU
in 2023
Solomon Islands
22,966 LSU
in 2023
French Polynesia rank
193rd
Solomon Islands rank
190th

Major livestock types β€” Stocks over time

  • French Polynesia
  • Solomon Islands
10.0k15.0k20.0k25.0k196119922023

How they compare

Solomon Islands currently reports 22,966 LSU against 17,443 LSU in French Polynesia, a difference of 5,523 LSU.

That makes Solomon Islands's figure about 1.3 times French Polynesia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was French Polynesia ahead.

French Polynesia ranks 193rd and Solomon Islands ranks 190th of 211 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, French Polynesia averaged higher in 1 and Solomon Islands in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade French Polynesia Solomon Islands Difference Ahead
1960s 12,935 LSU 10,242 LSU 2,693 LSU French Polynesia
1970s 11,375 LSU 21,092 LSU 9,717 LSU Solomon Islands
1980s 15,062 LSU 23,130 LSU 8,068 LSU Solomon Islands
1990s 16,632 LSU 20,156 LSU 3,525 LSU Solomon Islands
2000s 16,628 LSU 21,300 LSU 4,672 LSU Solomon Islands
2010s 16,736 LSU 22,426 LSU 5,690 LSU Solomon Islands
2020s 17,665 LSU 22,893 LSU 5,228 LSU Solomon Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher major livestock types β€” stocks, French Polynesia or Solomon Islands?
Solomon Islands, at 22,966 LSU against 17,443 LSU in French Polynesia as of 2023.
What is the difference in major livestock types β€” stocks between French Polynesia and Solomon Islands?
5,523 LSU, with Solomon Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for French Polynesia and Solomon Islands?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do French Polynesia and Solomon Islands rank globally for major livestock types β€” stocks?
French Polynesia ranks 193rd and Solomon Islands ranks 190th of 211 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Major livestock types β€” Stocks. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

French Polynesia vs Solomon Islands: Major livestock types β€” Stocks. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/major-livestock-types-stocks/french-polynesia/solomon-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/major-livestock-types-stocks/french-polynesia/solomon-islands/">French Polynesia vs Solomon Islands: Major livestock types β€” Stocks</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Major livestock types β€” Stocks
Unit
LSU
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
246 places, 14,138 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Patterns domain of FAOSTAT contains data on livestock numbers, shares of major livestock species and densities of livestock units in the agricultural land area. Values are calculated using Livestock Units (LSU), which facilitate aggregating information for different livestock types. Data are available by country, with global coverage, for the period 1961 to the most recent year available with annual updates. This methodology applies the LSU coefficients reported in the "Guidelines for the preparation of livestock sector reviews" (FAO, 2011). From this publication, LSU coefficients are computed by livestock type and by country. The reference unit used for the calculation of livestock units (=1 LSU) is the grazing equivalent of one adult dairy cow producing 3000 kg of milk annually, fed without additional concentrated foodstuffs. FAOSTAT agri-environmental indicators on livestock patterns closely follow the structure of the indicators in EUROSTAT.