Azerbaijan vs Burkina Faso: Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Azerbaijan
- Burkina Faso
How they compare
Burkina Faso currently reports 5.17 kg/ha against 5.15 kg/ha in Azerbaijan, a difference of 0.02 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Azerbaijan ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 160th and Burkina Faso ranks 158th of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Azerbaijan averaged higher in 2 and Burkina Faso in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Burkina Faso | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 5.63 kg/ha | 5.26 kg/ha | 0.3693 kg/ha | Azerbaijan |
| 2000s | 6.03 kg/ha | 7.33 kg/ha | 1.3 kg/ha | Burkina Faso |
| 2010s | 6.29 kg/ha | 7.58 kg/ha | 1.28 kg/ha | Burkina Faso |
| 2020s | 5.39 kg/ha | 5.26 kg/ha | 0.1329 kg/ha | Azerbaijan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Azerbaijan or Burkina Faso?
- Burkina Faso, at 5.17 kg/ha against 5.15 kg/ha in Azerbaijan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Azerbaijan and Burkina Faso?
- 0.02 kg/ha, with Burkina Faso ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Burkina Faso?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Azerbaijan and Burkina Faso rank globally for manure applied — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Azerbaijan ranks 160th and Burkina Faso ranks 158th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).