Benin vs Kazakhstan: Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Benin
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 5.34 kg/ha against 5.26 kg/ha in Benin, a difference of 0.08 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Benin ranks 169th and Kazakhstan ranks 168th of 200 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Benin | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 5.01 kg/ha | 5.54 kg/ha | 0.5288 kg/ha | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 3.5 kg/ha | 4.59 kg/ha | 1.09 kg/ha | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 3.7 kg/ha | 5.49 kg/ha | 1.79 kg/ha | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 4.72 kg/ha | 5.29 kg/ha | 0.5716 kg/ha | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Benin or Kazakhstan?
- Kazakhstan, at 5.34 kg/ha against 5.26 kg/ha in Benin as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Benin and Kazakhstan?
- 0.08 kg/ha, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Benin and Kazakhstan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Benin and Kazakhstan rank globally for manure applied — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Benin ranks 169th and Kazakhstan ranks 168th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).