Burkina Faso vs Ethiopia PDR: Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Burkina Faso
- Ethiopia PDR
How they compare
Burkina Faso currently reports 5.17 kg/ha against 5.17 kg/ha in Ethiopia PDR, a difference of 0 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ethiopia PDR ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 158th and Ethiopia PDR ranks 159th of 185 countries.
Ethiopia PDR has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Ethiopia PDR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2.11 kg/ha | 3.76 kg/ha | 1.64 kg/ha | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1970s | 2.57 kg/ha | 3.62 kg/ha | 1.05 kg/ha | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1980s | 4.05 kg/ha | 4.18 kg/ha | 0.1338 kg/ha | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1990s | 4.52 kg/ha | 5.06 kg/ha | 0.5402 kg/ha | Ethiopia PDR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Burkina Faso or Ethiopia PDR?
- Burkina Faso, at 5.17 kg/ha against 5.17 kg/ha in Ethiopia PDR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Burkina Faso and Ethiopia PDR?
- 0 kg/ha, with Burkina Faso ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Ethiopia PDR?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Burkina Faso and Ethiopia PDR rank globally for manure applied — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Burkina Faso ranks 158th and Ethiopia PDR ranks 159th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).