Burkina Faso vs Kazakhstan: Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Burkina Faso
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 5.34 kg/ha against 5.17 kg/ha in Burkina Faso, a difference of 0.17 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 158th and Kazakhstan ranks 156th of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 2 and Kazakhstan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 5.26 kg/ha | 5.54 kg/ha | 0.284 kg/ha | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 7.33 kg/ha | 4.59 kg/ha | 2.74 kg/ha | Burkina Faso |
| 2010s | 7.58 kg/ha | 5.49 kg/ha | 2.09 kg/ha | Burkina Faso |
| 2020s | 5.26 kg/ha | 5.29 kg/ha | 0.0296 kg/ha | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Burkina Faso or Kazakhstan?
- Kazakhstan, at 5.34 kg/ha against 5.17 kg/ha in Burkina Faso as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Burkina Faso and Kazakhstan?
- 0.17 kg/ha, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Kazakhstan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Burkina Faso and Kazakhstan rank globally for manure applied — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Burkina Faso ranks 158th and Kazakhstan ranks 156th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).