Cambodia vs Cuba: Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Cambodia
- Cuba
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 12.36 kg/ha against 11.78 kg/ha in Cambodia, a difference of 0.58 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cuba ahead.
Cambodia ranks 133rd and Cuba ranks 131st of 200 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Cambodia averaged higher in 5 and Cuba in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Cuba | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 11.7 kg/ha | 24.43 kg/ha | 12.73 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 1970s | 15.87 kg/ha | 15.47 kg/ha | 0.3991 kg/ha | Cambodia |
| 1980s | 12.18 kg/ha | 14.87 kg/ha | 2.69 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 1990s | 13.84 kg/ha | 12.74 kg/ha | 1.11 kg/ha | Cambodia |
| 2000s | 16.23 kg/ha | 11.45 kg/ha | 4.78 kg/ha | Cambodia |
| 2010s | 14.56 kg/ha | 13.44 kg/ha | 1.12 kg/ha | Cambodia |
| 2020s | 12.17 kg/ha | 10.86 kg/ha | 1.31 kg/ha | Cambodia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Cambodia or Cuba?
- Cuba, at 12.36 kg/ha against 11.78 kg/ha in Cambodia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Cambodia and Cuba?
- 0.58 kg/ha, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Cuba?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cambodia and Cuba rank globally for manure applied — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Cambodia ranks 133rd and Cuba ranks 131st of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).