Cambodia vs Latvia: Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Cambodia
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 12.12 kg/ha against 11.78 kg/ha in Cambodia, a difference of 0.34 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.
Cambodia ranks 133rd and Latvia ranks 132nd of 200 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Cambodia averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 14.3 kg/ha | 24.28 kg/ha | 9.98 kg/ha | Latvia |
| 2000s | 16.23 kg/ha | 17.51 kg/ha | 1.28 kg/ha | Latvia |
| 2010s | 14.56 kg/ha | 14.36 kg/ha | 0.201 kg/ha | Cambodia |
| 2020s | 12.17 kg/ha | 12.78 kg/ha | 0.6131 kg/ha | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Cambodia or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 12.12 kg/ha against 11.78 kg/ha in Cambodia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Cambodia and Latvia?
- 0.34 kg/ha, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Latvia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Cambodia and Latvia rank globally for manure applied — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Cambodia ranks 133rd and Latvia ranks 132nd of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).