Canada vs Ethiopia: Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Canada
- Ethiopia
How they compare
Ethiopia currently reports 6.81 kg/ha against 5.66 kg/ha in Canada, a difference of 1.15 kg/ha.
That makes Ethiopia's figure about 1.2 times Canada's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Canada ahead.
Canada ranks 163rd and Ethiopia ranks 160th of 200 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Canada averaged higher in 2 and Ethiopia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Ethiopia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 5.12 kg/ha | 4.79 kg/ha | 0.33 kg/ha | Canada |
| 2000s | 5.69 kg/ha | 5.11 kg/ha | 0.5815 kg/ha | Canada |
| 2010s | 5.6 kg/ha | 6.56 kg/ha | 0.9574 kg/ha | Ethiopia |
| 2020s | 5.68 kg/ha | 6.44 kg/ha | 0.7599 kg/ha | Ethiopia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Canada or Ethiopia?
- Ethiopia, at 6.81 kg/ha against 5.66 kg/ha in Canada as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Canada and Ethiopia?
- 1.15 kg/ha, with Ethiopia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Ethiopia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Canada and Ethiopia rank globally for manure applied — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Canada ranks 163rd and Ethiopia ranks 160th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).