Congo vs Libya: Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Congo
- Libya
How they compare
Congo currently reports 3.13 kg/ha against 3.07 kg/ha in Libya, a difference of 0.06 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 191st and Libya ranks 192nd of 200 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.806 kg/ha | 0.6304 kg/ha | 0.1756 kg/ha | Congo |
| 1970s | 1.29 kg/ha | 0.9228 kg/ha | 0.3627 kg/ha | Congo |
| 1980s | 1.39 kg/ha | 1.34 kg/ha | 0.0452 kg/ha | Congo |
| 1990s | 1.92 kg/ha | 1.73 kg/ha | 0.1804 kg/ha | Congo |
| 2000s | 2.5 kg/ha | 2.19 kg/ha | 0.3024 kg/ha | Congo |
| 2010s | 3.09 kg/ha | 2.9 kg/ha | 0.1869 kg/ha | Congo |
| 2020s | 3.09 kg/ha | 3.01 kg/ha | 0.0807 kg/ha | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Congo or Libya?
- Congo, at 3.13 kg/ha against 3.07 kg/ha in Libya as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Congo and Libya?
- 0.06 kg/ha, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Libya?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Congo and Libya rank globally for manure applied — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Congo ranks 191st and Libya ranks 192nd of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).