Cuba vs Uganda: Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Cuba
- Uganda
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 12.36 kg/ha against 11.58 kg/ha in Uganda, a difference of 0.78 kg/ha.
That makes Cuba's figure about 1.1 times Uganda's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 131st and Uganda ranks 134th of 200 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 6 and Uganda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 24.43 kg/ha | 1.47 kg/ha | 22.96 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 1970s | 15.47 kg/ha | 1.9 kg/ha | 13.58 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 1980s | 14.87 kg/ha | 2.29 kg/ha | 12.58 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 1990s | 12.74 kg/ha | 4.54 kg/ha | 8.19 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 2000s | 11.45 kg/ha | 6.01 kg/ha | 5.44 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 2010s | 13.44 kg/ha | 8.77 kg/ha | 4.67 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 2020s | 10.86 kg/ha | 11.36 kg/ha | 0.5005 kg/ha | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Cuba or Uganda?
- Cuba, at 12.36 kg/ha against 11.58 kg/ha in Uganda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Cuba and Uganda?
- 0.78 kg/ha, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Uganda?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cuba and Uganda rank globally for manure applied — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Cuba ranks 131st and Uganda ranks 134th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).