Cyprus vs Ecuador: Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Cyprus
- Ecuador
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 34.37 kg/ha against 34.16 kg/ha in Cyprus, a difference of 0.21 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.
Cyprus ranks 61st and Ecuador ranks 60th of 200 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Cyprus averaged higher in 4 and Ecuador in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cyprus | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2.68 kg/ha | 15.68 kg/ha | 13 kg/ha | Ecuador |
| 1970s | 9.44 kg/ha | 23.28 kg/ha | 13.85 kg/ha | Ecuador |
| 1980s | 19.96 kg/ha | 26.1 kg/ha | 6.15 kg/ha | Ecuador |
| 1990s | 37.55 kg/ha | 26.85 kg/ha | 10.7 kg/ha | Cyprus |
| 2000s | 47.02 kg/ha | 32.85 kg/ha | 14.16 kg/ha | Cyprus |
| 2010s | 47.5 kg/ha | 36.09 kg/ha | 11.41 kg/ha | Cyprus |
| 2020s | 39.62 kg/ha | 34.49 kg/ha | 5.12 kg/ha | Cyprus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Cyprus or Ecuador?
- Ecuador, at 34.37 kg/ha against 34.16 kg/ha in Cyprus as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Cyprus and Ecuador?
- 0.21 kg/ha, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Ecuador?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cyprus and Ecuador rank globally for manure applied — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Cyprus ranks 61st and Ecuador ranks 60th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).